Showing posts with label Original Dungeons Dragons (OD&D): Discussion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Original Dungeons Dragons (OD&D): Discussion. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 2, 2019

What is this Archive?

This archive preserves many of the posts made to the Holmes Basic D&D Community on the late G+. I created this Community in late 2012, not long after Communities were added, and it existed through April 2nd 2019, when G+ was shutdown for non-commercial users. By the end there were over 600 members. While most were not active, there was always a core group of commenters to keep things interesting.

There are over 2100 posts included, made by myself and various members of the community, each accompanied by its original comments. While a number of posts (~500?) are shares and thus duplicative of posts on the Zenopus Archives blog, these have been saved because they include different comments. The other ~1600 posts fall into two broad categories. I often used G+ for quick shares of images and links of interest to the community, material often not posted to the ZA blog. And then there are the many posts by other members of the community. A big thank you to everyone who participated!

Due to limitations of the application (Google+ Exporter) used to extract the posts from G+, every post here is labeled as "Posted by Zenopus Archives", whether or not I was the original poster. However, the identity of the original poster is preserved as one of the labels, and as time allows I have been slowly adding this information to each applicable post. All of an individual's posts can be found by clicking on the relevant name in the Label list in the right sidebar (only visible in desktop format). 

Most of the originally posted images are preserved. I went through the entire blog and manually downloaded and re-uploaded the images so they wouldn't be lost. The harvester preserved a link to each image in the relevant users Google+ "Album Archive", but Google may delete these at any time going forward. A few images seem to be missing; I don't know if the harvesting program failed to grab them or the original source had been removed. I've also noticed that a number of links are missing as well, and I will eventually re-add these.

All of the posts originally made to the Holmes Basic G+ Community are tagged with the label "Holmes Basic: Discussion".

I added a few other posts of interest that I made to other communities or to one of my G+ collections. I will try to note these here:

~50 posts from the OD&D Community. These are each labeled with "Original Dungeons Dragon (OD&D): Discussion" or "Original Dungeons Dragon (OD&D): Links & Resources" or "Original Dungeons Dragon (OD&D): Classified".

~70 posts from the OSR Community. These are each labeled with "OSR: Discussion" or "OSR: Free Stuff" or "OSR: News".

~150 Public Posts. These are labeled only with "Zenopus Archives" without a "Holmes Basic: Discussion" label.

For each of the above, click on the relevant post to bring up all posts with that label.

Saturday, March 21, 2015

Mike Mornard (Gronan) fills us in on Gygax's XP requirements for characters over name level in the LBBs.

Mike Mornard (Gronan) fills us in on Gygax's XP requirements for characters over name level in the LBBs. This information is missing from the tables in Men & Magic, so it's very useful to have.
http://odd74.proboards.com/post/161241

Saturday, December 13, 2014

Idle thought on adding subclasses to whitebox OD&D or Holmes, but without adding any new rules.

Idle thought on adding subclasses to whitebox OD&D or Holmes, but without adding any new rules.
Paladin = Fighter/Cleric
Ranger = Fighter/Thief
Monk = Cleric/Thief
Druid = Cleric/MU
Bard = Thief/MU
Subclasses are for humans only (Fighter/MU is still just elves).
Use whatever multi-class rules you use for elves.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

OD&D rule buried in the description of the monk in Blackmoor: "Note however that extremely silent creatures will...

OD&D rule buried in the description of the monk in Blackmoor: "Note however that extremely silent creatures will double surprise possibilities, i.e., halflings, thieves, bugbears and undead double possibilities".

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Barker's copy of OD&D

"Men & Magic inside cover with Prof. Barker’s signature"

"As part of the process of cataloging Professor Barker’s vast collection of games and material related to Tekumel, we discovered Professor Barker’s copy of OD&D.  When we looked inside the covers, though, we discovered that Professor Barker not only signed the books but dated them as well."
http://blog.tekumelfoundation.org/2014/02/19/another-40th-anniversary-for-original-dd

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

In the Greyhawk Supplment, Men are listed as getting 1 or 2 attacks




Here's something I never noticed in Greyhawk before. Men are listed as getting 1 or 2 attacks, unlike humanoids. As far as I can tell this is not explained anywhere. It could be reference back to the Chainmail "Weapon class" rules for Man-to-Man Combat.  If so though it should really be "1 or 2 or 3" per Chainmail, page 26. Also, it should apply to the humanoids if they are using weapons.

What is more likely is that it is an early reference to a rule change for Berserker. In OD&D Vol 2, they just get a single attack at +2 against normal men. But in the Monster Manual this was changed to 2 attacks or one at +2 to hit; thus their attacks are listed as 1 (or 2). So possibly Gygax was using this rule change at the time of Greyhawk but forgot to explain it in the text.

Monday, October 21, 2013

1976 D&D ad using the Eldritch Wizardry cover art, ran in Fantasy and Science Fiction magazine, scan courtesy...

1976 D&D ad using the Eldritch Wizardry cover art, ran in Fantasy and Science Fiction magazine, scan courtesy BNagata at the Acaeum.

"You Enter a World of Swords & Sorcery ... when you adventure into the strange and fantastic places awaiting in Dungeons & Dragons"
http://www.acaeum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?cache=1&p=216945#p216945